User talk:Xyxyboy/Archive 1

Orphaned non-free image (File:MEUSA.Logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MEUSA.Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 01:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Xyxyboy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 873 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Alice Schonfeld - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CFACLOGO.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:CFACLOGO.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Talk:Canvass for a Cause. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. Zhang He (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:MEUSA canvass.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MEUSA canvass.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Canvass for a Cause

A tag has been placed on Canvass for a Cause requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 23:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

All but two of the references are from their website and facebook. If they really are that important, you should be able to show properly how they pass WP:ORG. Ironholds (talk) 03:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Got your email, there are no secrets to sourcing other than understanding what kind of sources that you can use, so be sure to read the verifiability policy and reliability guideline. In my opinion Wikipedia uses verifiability, notability, no original research, and What Wikikipedia is Not to define what Wikipedia is: an encyclopedia. Putting up articles which will survive can be very difficult if you don't have a pretty good knowledge of those four policies, so my #1 advice is to read them beginning to end. Best wishes and good luck, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 02:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Canvass for a Cause

I have nominated Canvass for a Cause, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canvass for a Cause. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rankiri (talk) 20:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CFACLOGO.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CFACLOGO.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Regarding refactoring my !vote

I am responding to your post from Talk:Tres Watson here, in part because it is partially off-topic for that page, and in part because that page may be deleted in the near future, and some of this you may wish to refer to at a later date.

There is still time to go before the end of the deletion discussion; The Gadget Guys will not be gone before the end (at least not due to the Prod, which takes a week to take effect), assuming the deletion discussion is not extended. It is also not unthinkable that a new Canvass for a Cause might appear, as the article was most recently deleted due to its content rather than due to its subject. Plus, only one person need object in order to remove the PROD from Gadget Guys. As such, I am keeping my options open on recasting my !vote.

I do think you're misunderstanding what is being said when it is said you are being cited as a spokesperson in an article. It is not a statement of what your position in the organization is, but rather a note that you are being quoted as a person to give a voice to the organization, and thus the use of a quote from you is not an indication of your import separate from the organization. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)