User talk:YJAX

Welcome![edit]

Hello, YJAX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 12:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

World Happiness Report (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Survey, LSE, Gallup and National statistics

List of countries by mobile banking usage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bain

Quality of life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gallup

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of countries by time devoted to leisure and personal care, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Doctor and Travel time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of international rankings may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[List of countries by hospital beds]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Particulates, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Danish and IARC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Input on image decision[edit]

Hi you are invited to vote for the image to be used on the LG G2 infobox page at Talk:LG G2 .I do hope that you could participate in this consensus making, Thanks! GadgetsGuy (talk) 06:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: G3[edit]

So basically, I cannot remove anything if it is got a source attached to it, right? Even if I think the language you used is too promotional sounding. Ironically, given your ploy to protect sourced information, your source does NOT state that that the G3 is the first major smartphone with a Quad HD screen.

I'm just frustrated right now; this is not the only stupid edit war I've had on this page, or related, in the last little while. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:Verifiability, you cannot modify the source's content or change its meaning - Doing so would constitute to vandalism. It has to be stated exactly as the source does. I will add the source for the qHD part. Thanks. YJAX (talk) 17:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metropolitan area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gangnam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bloomberg Innovation Index, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Massyparcer (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 17:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Sustainable Cities Index[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Sustainable Cities Index, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.arcadis.it/press/Sustainability_of_global_cities_held_back_by_social_factors_says_new_index.aspx, http://www.cebr.com/reports/global-built-asset-performance-index/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sustainable Cities Index and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Sustainable Cities Index, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sustainable Cities Index. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Sustainable Cities Index with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Sustainable Cities Index saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bloomberg Innovation Index[edit]

Hello YJAX,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bloomberg Innovation Index for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roshan014 (talk) 11:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Country Brand Index listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Country Brand Index. Since you had some involvement with the Country Brand Index redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. McGeddon (talk) 10:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of countries by 25- to 34-year-olds having a tertiary education degree[edit]

The article List of countries by 25- to 34-year-olds having a tertiary education degree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an article, made by an obvious sock account, that is devotes to making lists of absolutely fucking anything, that allows their nation to be placed at the top of said list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of countries by 25- to 64-year-olds having a tertiary education degree[edit]

The article List of countries by 25- to 64-year-olds having a tertiary education degree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article was created by a confirmed sock account. (both the sock(s) and master account are indef blocked)

They have a history of creating non-notable articles, with the sole intention of creating a list that shows their nation as best at something, for nationalistic purposes. There is clearly zero notability here, it's such an obscure category, that it should be deleted ASAP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 11:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of countries by time devoted to leisure and personal care[edit]

The article List of countries by time devoted to leisure and personal care has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is not clear what the figures mean. The figures do not match the source. Even the source figures do not make sense (to me).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of OECD countries by job security for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of OECD countries by job security is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of OECD countries by job security until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of countries by women's average years in school for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of countries by women's average years in school is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by women's average years in school until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – XYZt (talk | contribs) – 07:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]