User talk:Yiwistar

March 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nina Dobrev. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emanuela Rei for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emanuela Rei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emanuela Rei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Antila333 (talk) 12:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

requirements in Wikipedia[edit]

After seeing you create an article for actress Allie Bertram (from the TV series Mako: Island of Secrets), I have determined, as likely would be the case with many other editors, that she fails notability requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia right now. Please read WP:N for more about these requirements, as well as WP:NACTOR for specific requirements on actors/actresses. I turned the article into a redirect to the Mako: Island of Secrets article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 10:16, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I wasn't completely done editing the page, you could have let it go and I made another page. Please give me at least one condition that is or is not on the page without being valid or that the page does not meet the wiki requirements. You just send it to me and it's not good and change my edits without ever replying or giving me what to fix. --> --Yiwistar (contribs • talk) 13:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yiwistar, consider this an official "warning": you are attempting to subvert the process here, which is an example of Disruptive editing – I had already converted Allie Bertram to a redirect on the exact basis that MPFitz1968 outlines above and told you to try to create a Draft first, and instead you sneakily tried to "get around" this by "recreating" the article at Allie Bertram (actress) (which has also been converted to a redirect). This behavior is not OK, and if try something like this again, it is likely that somebody will report you and you risk getting blocked. Do not do this again. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IJBall Whell the only ones who have problems with me and against me are you, my edit bothers you even though, I don't know why?? --Yiwistar (contribs • talk) 12:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emanuela Rei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Giorgia Boni for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgia Boni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgia Boni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quiero Volver[edit]

Hello! I'm reaching out beacuse I've noted that you recently reverted my edits on the article Martina Stoessel, specifically in the "Studio albums" section. I follow Tini's music and Quiero Volver never received a gold certification in Argentina. Remember one thing is being elegible for being certified, and another completely different thing is actually getting certified by a phonographic company, like CAPIF in this case. Now, you keep claiming that the album received the certification, yet you provide a reference to Tini (Martina Stoessel)'s certification, which is a tweet that dates of 2016. Please, unless you find a reliable source (not a tweet from some fan) that proves that Quiero Volver has been certified gold in Argentina, stop adding the certification as it is false information and it might mislead Wikipedia readers. Thank you. --Swe97 (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tini (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gente.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giorgia Boni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thou Shalt Not Kill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Martina Stoessel songs has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Martina Stoessel songs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single Vendor Charts[edit]

Please stop adding the Taiwanese Albums chart sourced from KKBox or 5Music. Per WP:SINGLEVENDOR these are not appropriate charts for use on wikipedia. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 23:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La Loto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrés Torres.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latin music invitation[edit]

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Erick (talk) 13:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of Tini certifications[edit]

You have been using vague videos on Twitter as sources for Tini certification. These are very obviously primary sources. They are also obviously not independent. Finally, The claim for certification in Spain made here is an obvious fakery. All certifications in Spain are very well listed at the official website and it's not listed there. This just justifies my thoughts that these Twitter posts cannot be used as a reliable source for certifications. --Muhandes (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are twitter accounts that managed to write that the song received certification without any source, but these are official twitter accounts confirmed by Tini's team and there is a video (which you obviously haven't watched) that clearly shows all the single certifications that Tini has received so far, and jer mother even published those videos on her Instagram story, and they were preserved on tweerer Yiwistar (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are official Tini team, I never said otherwise. I said they are primary sources, not independent, and highly suspect. I am not going to argue with you on the including them, but for sure they have nothing to do with PROMUSICAE, CUD or CAPIF, so I am removing those references. If you can show the certifications were made by those organizations (good luck with that, two of them no longer exist) then add them back. Otherwise this part is most certainly unsourced. Muhandes (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to the numbers you added on La Triple T. I don't know where this numbers comes from, so unless you have a source, please don't restore them. Also, please read the documentation for {{Certification Table Entry}} etc., I came here because of malformed usage which popped multiple warnings. --Muhandes (talk) 21:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And now you are restoring these without discussion, which is edit warring. Please stop. Muhandes (talk) 10:45, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the links of refs that are placed next to the numbers for the sold copies. It says what Certification is awarded for Sold Singles in Colombia and Peru. Yiwistar (talk) 15:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are four major issues with that. First, those numbers are for UNIMPRO (Peru) and ASINCOL (Columbia) certifications, and you have not shown that these organizations awarded the certifications. I will be shocked if they are since ASINCOL stopped operating at least a decade ago, and UNIMPRO has not granted any certifications since 2012. Second, even if it was UNIMPRO/ASINCOL, the source is from 2013 for Peru and 2007 (!!!!) for Columbia. Both references refer to physical singles without digital sales or streaming. Are you going to insist that 10,000 physical sales were made in Peru or 40,000 in Columbia? Third, you didn't even take the number from the table, which leads me to think that you have a serious problem understanding what sources are for. You seem to believe that you can invent a number, put some random citation next to it, and that number becomes correct somehow, but this is not how things work. Finally, and most importantly, we already discussed the issue with the awarding organization a month ago, and now you went and restored the same edits, which amounts to edit warring. Please stop. Muhandes (talk) 14:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tini Tini Tini, you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 08:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained above, you are adding unsourced Information. If you explain what you want to do I can help, but please stop these edits. --Muhandes (talk) 08:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, all that stands for the songs and that, but for this album you can't put that because in the articles it says how they are certified, and here the number of streamed/sold copies automatically appears in the request. These 500,000 are digital sales, and the table shows how many were actually sold on in physical format. So you cant just removing this. Yiwistar (talk) 13:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where in the article does it show that it was certified in Chile and in Central America? I didn't remove the Argentina number. --Muhandes (talk) 14:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please stop edit warring. If you continue to edit war you will be blocked. --Muhandes (talk) 14:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 14:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are repeatedly adding unsourced information after repeated warnings. Please stop. If you think the information is source, discuss on the talk page of the article. --Muhandes (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is some od sources od you didnt see them before: https://www.lacoope.net/lacoope/nota/2020-12-10-10-28-38-tini-logra-disco-de-oro-en-centroamerica-por-tini-tini-tini

https://www.sonymusiclatin.com/tini-une-fuerzas-con-anitta-becky-g-para-lanzar-nuevo-sencillo-la-loto-junto-al-video-musical/

https://www.cmtv.com.ar/noticias/noticia_completa.php?bnid=2229&nid=27979&artista=Tini_Stoessel&titulo=Nuevos_shows_de_Tini

Yiwistar (talk) 16:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's what it says in the articles, I'm not making up about the certifications. Yiwistar (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I never said you are making things up. I said you are adding unsourced information. If you cannot understand the difference, perhaps you are lacking the required competance to edit Wikipedia. It is not enough that a source exists, you need to cite it correctly. Again, if you can't figure out how to do this, perhaps you should not edit. Muhandes (talk) 22:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to display a general lack of competance. You provided the link http://www.ifpichile.cl/ as a source for the number 90,000. The number 90,000 does not appear on this page nor does the page say anywhere what a Platinum certification is for. Even if it did, there is no evidence the certification was made by IFPI Chile. I explained this to you at least five times by now and you continue to either ignore or, more likely, completly misunderstand what I am talking about. Do I need to get an administrator invovled and block your account for you to understand? Stop introducing unsourced information. If you lack the competance to say what is a valid source, stop introducing any information. Clear and simple. Muhandes (talk) 09:40, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read it a little better. If you look a little closer at the wiki certification's page, you will see which company is in charge of which country and how many copies need to be sold to get that certification. They will not write the number of sold copies in the articles. It's kind of logical when you see the certification table of how many copies of the album have been sold. And for Chile it is definitely IFPI CL because no one else can give certification just like that. Yiwistar (talk) 14:42, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are wrong. Do you have reliable sources that no one else can give [a] certification in Chile? With few exceptions, gold "awards" are given in South America by the labels, on their own terms, not by the IFPI representative. This has been the case for many years now, since the move to digital music. There are no "certifications" because no one certifies anything. In fact, I could not even find any mention on IFPI Chile website that they are seeing it as their responsibility, not to speak of being their exclusive right. You seem to be confusing the state twenty years ago with the state of things now. If you think I am wrong, please provide a reliable source. Otherwise, please don't link IFPI Chile with any certification made in Chile. Muhandes (talk) 15:43, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With a little research I found out that indeed you are most likely wrong. I was told the organization currently awarding certifications in Chile is not IFPI Chile, it is Profovi. Here is their award list. Muhandes (talk) 10:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina certifications[edit]

You added sales amounts Special:Diff/1133967179 which the template translated into shipments. I don't speak the language, but from google translation of this document it seems like albums are certified according to streaming too since 2016. Is this correct? --Muhandes (talk) 13:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cupido (album). Muhandes (talk) 14:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One post above I explained the problem. In this edit summary I request, again, that you discuss the problem. If you continue the disruptive editing and keep ignoring every single editor who tries to help you, you will be blocked. --Muhandes (talk) 14:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tini Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hola.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Image of You (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:LMYNLTourPoster.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LMYNLTourPoster.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]