User talk:YoEmFuji

Welcome!

Hello, YoEmFuji, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Signpost, our newspaper.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! TheWin RatHere! 17:42, 27 February 2019 (UTC) TheWin RatHere! 17:42, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brain vital signs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brain vital signs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain vital signs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Medical related content

Hello YoEmFuji! You indicated you were a bit perplexed about why your article Brain vital signs is being considered for deletion, so I wanted to reach out to you. We really try to summarize topics in a neutral manner, being careful not to overemphasize thing or puff something up like is often done in news reports. And when it comes to medical content, we try not to cite primary studies, instead we try to summarize what secondary medical sources such as reviews and textbooks have to say. Writing and sourcing in this manner does take some time getting used to, but do not worry, you'll get the hang of it. You can also come and join us over at WikiProject Medicine and help us improve coverage of medical-related topics. See you around, – Thjarkur (talk) 22:22, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the insight. I am happy to edit the write-up but sadly, controlling editors have decided to shut it down and delete instead. I think it's unfair that I did not get a chance to edit and instead I feel like I am being censored in this supposedly democratic space. It would be great if expert wiki editor(s) suggested edits or ways of improvement rather than just delete but it seems some enjoy the power? I am eager to learn so please do forward me any other helpful links/guidelines. YoEmFuji (talk) 23:04, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?

Hello YoEmFuji. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:YoEmFuji. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=YoEmFuji|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not a paid anything. I am a neuroscience student just entering the field and reading up on local neuroscience news especially based in BC. I am looking at project topics and looking for companies to do case studies so using wiki to start generating content. I am not well versed in the Wikiverse since I don't live and troll on net as some do, which is why I asked on the talking page of the deletion discussion how I can improve an entry, especially since I've tried to do my homework and research by sourcing news articles. I am quite alarmed by the hostile nature of your commentary. Rather than attacking me for submitting a few entries, how about suggesting ways I can improve or write a better wiki entry? Isn't this a place to provide information for learning/resource? Instead, it seems like a place to get trolled/shut down. YoEmFuji (talk) 22:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HealthTech Connex, Inc.

Hello, YoEmFuji. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "HealthTech Connex".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brain Vital Signs concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Brain Vital Signs, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brain Vital Signs

Hello, YoEmFuji. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brain Vital Signs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 20:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]