User talk:Yonobarn

Welcome!

Hello, Yonobarn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Willowburn FC, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... discospinster _talk 23:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willowburn FC

The article Willowburn FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-professional football club of unclear notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 23:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Willowburn FC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willowburn FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willowburn FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 13:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:1932 Hillman Wizard.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:1932 Hillman Wizard.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 03:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The free license you gave can not be correct, since it is for works of government bodies in the U.K. Also, any permission you have from the copyright holder (I assume you don't own the copyright from your description) probably should be verified by something on the site you link to, or an email (see WP:OTRS). —innotata 15:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There still is no evidence that the copyright holder released the rights to the image (it's not perfectly clear who the copyright holder is from the description). This also is required. —innotata 21:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]