User talk:Yoshi Henry

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Yoshi Henry, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Phil swift, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ElongatedMusketeer (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2019 (UTC) im planning on doing my unblock request soon, but i am just wondering if an admin could clear all of the text on my user page (not my talk page, just the normal one), as i dont want it on there anymore, thanks![reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phil swift[edit]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Phil swift, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ElongatedMusketeer (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=I wont vandilize again and i will be respectful ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yoshi Henry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I should not call phill swift an american meme god and i should of been respectful and listed the real job title, I will Remember not to do this again and i will be respectful, thanks. Yoshi Henry (talk) 12:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is hardly the only problem with your editing. Yamla (talk) 13:03, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yoshi Henry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that wikipedia is a platform for encyclopedic content, and me using it for making a joke without justifying it is a major violation of the policy and should not be done. The reputation of wikipedia is scared everytime someone like me does something like this it can tarnish the reputation of that person as lots of search engines (such as google, and duckduckgo) link to wikipedia and people look at this website for quick information. However the reputation of wikipedia has unfortunately not been the best and it is people like me who make wikipedia a less trustworthy website, i understand a rejection or an accept but please understand, thank you. P.S. Can you please List the other problems with my editing, Thanks!pps i did not commint sock puppetry Yoshi Henry (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yoshi Henry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, it is over a year since my block from Wikipedia, for one, let me say sorry, sorry for the vandalism I did, i am very sorry for this. Now, i am here much, much later then my block, and i do believe that the the admins of Wikipedia should reconsider my block, i did this over a year ago, and i firmly believe that if you unblock me, and give me a second chance, i could change Wikipedia for the better, i was being very irresponsible when i did this, and i now understand that calling someone an “american meme god” is very disrespectful to them, especially on such a huge platform like Wikipedia, a platform that hundreds of thousands of people from across the world view for information every day, and spreading misinformation is not a joke, even if it seems like one, it is serious, especially for people who are well known, like Phil swift, and while some people may think that it is hilarious, most people will see it as very irresponsible, and it is not correct that i did that, it was definitely a warranted block, but, if you give me one, and only one more chance, i could make Wikipedia for the better, i am very sorry for the damages i have caused, but i hope that the one reading this can accept my apology, and, if you don’t, that is fine, i'll be content with it, i just want a second chance.Yoshi Henry (talk) 13:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While your apology is appreciated, the main issue with Phil swift was not that it was simply disrespectful, but because it violated specific policies and guidelines regarding article creation and sourcing. I would consider unblocking if you can clearly identify why your edits were against policy (Hint: you can find the answer by reading through WP:BLP. Please provide your explanation in your own words, do not simply copy the relevant text.) _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.