User talk:Yuehwang

Arbitrary-precision arithmetic[edit]

Reference section should hold papers that are cited in the article. It is not a general bibliography.

Furthermore, many of the references appear irrelevant to the article. Implementing floating point in an FPGA?

Glrx (talk) 20:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arbitrary-precision arithmetic. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Glrx (talk) 20:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Arbitrary-precision arithmetic shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Glrx (talk) 23:17, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Glrx. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Guy Macon (talk) 16:24, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]