User talk:Zacharybcollins/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Citations in Dnepro-Carpathian Strategic Offensive (aka Battle of West Ukraine)
I noticed that you have combined both Krivosheev citations into one. There is a small issue with that, as the citations were to different parts of that work (a section dealing with strategic operations and a section dealing with weaponry losses). IMHO, this is not crucial, but perhaps you didn't realize that and thus now may want to reconsider. With respect, Ko Soi IX (talk) 01:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
My primary concern was fixing the redirects so the dashes was really just an afterthought. That said, I didn't think it was fixed anywhere, though I may well be wrong. All the dashes separating the names, with all the dashes in the names as well, just looks awful. Perhaps spaced endashes instead of unspaced emdashes? --ROGER DAVIES talk 21:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- All right, I see that. Also, now that I think about it, some of the offensives have multiple constituent battles which have separate articles (for example, current tenth one on Budapest is really Budapest and Belgrade, so the points look better and make it easier to distinguish between the ten offensives, so I suppose I'll leave it for now unless someone else complains. Joe (Talk) 21:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Milhist coordinators
You have been mentioned here as a possible coopted Milhist coordinator. You may wish to comment :) --ROGER DAVIES talk 09:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
You're My Best Friend.
So, uh, how ya' doin'? Good? That's good. I am also good. I appreciate you asking. We are very considerate fellows, you and I. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacharybcollins (talk • contribs) 15:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)