User talk:Zacknoor123

``This is the beginning of my new page``

@Joe Roe: Nobody seems to care about my requests. Please help me unblock. I have tried reaching the same administrator but he/she doesn't care to respond to my request. Please help. There is a lot of good I can do especially when it comes to historic standing of the different cities.

@Bbb23: Please respond. You blocked me for no reason at all. If you have blocked me then please give me a chance to keep my point.

@GB fan: Please help me with the block revert. I am not a sockpuppeteer. Its a huge misunderstanding.

@Bbb23: Please respond to the unblock request

{{unblock|reason=Hi, I don't have multiple accounts, the User:Amitsmatharu works is the same building. This is a co-working office and we share the same IP due to common wifi that exists in the building. I work as a content writer for an organization which is into technical manuals.I have no clue who is user:Xaqi77. Probably someone else working in the same building. I have no connection with any of them other than the part when I helped User:amitsmarharu understand how wikipedia editing works. I explained him how he could make changes and what counts as changes.~~~}}

January 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Hi, I don't have multiple accounts, the User:Amitsmatharu works is the same building. This is a co-working office and we share the same IP due to common wifi that exists in the building. I work as a content writer for an organization which is into technical manuals.I have no clue who is user:Xaqi77. Probably someone else working in the same building. I have no connection with any of them other than the part when I helped User:amitsmarharu understand how wikipedia editing works. I explained him how he could make changes and what counts as changes.~~~}}

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zacknoor123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23831 was submitted on Jan 25, 2019 19:48:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zacknoor123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23856 was submitted on Jan 29, 2019 08:19:37. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zacknoor123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23918 was submitted on Feb 10, 2019 09:35:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zacknoor123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppteer. I work in a co-working space. Most of my time is spent in the office. Its a common wifi which triggered the misunderstanding. Please help me understand what can I do to fix it? I don't know anyone else other than user:amrithasaru cause I showed him wikipedia editing is done. Zacknoor123 (talk) 12:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You and Omo95 are obviously related. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not reviewing this because I reviewed one of the UTRS unblock requests. Pinging in Bbb23 in case they have anything to add as they are the blocking CheckUser. I don't buy your reasoning though, it's a bit strange that User:Omo95 was created just as this one was blocked. That's just one example. I'm also concerned about your competency to edit Wikipedia. The instructions on how to post the unblock request are very clear on the blocking template, yet, as your talk page indicates, you have failed to follow this. I had to tell you almost step by step in the UTRS appeal.-- 5 albert square (talk) 15:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@5 albert square: Thank you for the criticism. First let me clear out, I have no idea who User:Omo95 is, there are multiple companies in the office that I work from. A lot of digital marketing companies as well who use platforms for their clients. I can only work from my office and not tell others what to do and what not to do. So if that has been the case then I am not aware of the situation. What reason do I have to create another username when I have been trying to unblock my account? I agree I have helped the User:amitsmarharu but that wasn't for any other purpose than being educational guide. He came up to me and requested for assistance and I decided to do so. That shouldn't be a reason to be blocked. and my competency to edit wikipedia can't be tested on the basis if I can edit templates or not. It should be based on what do I have to in books that I can provide to free source of knowledge and my language. Now tell me if that is a crime then say so. It would ease my mind. Templates are definitely something new for me and I am trying to learn. If everyone who comes to this platform as an expert in editing templates then Wikipedia is a template source rather than source of knowledge. Zacknoor123 (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request denied?[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zacknoor123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First I was told that I was related to user:amrithasaru now I am being informed that I am connected to user:omo95. How does that make any sense. I have never met that person. I don't even know this person and I am being blamed for something I haven't done. Please explain the reason for denying the request. Zacknoor123 (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A little Googling shows a surprising coincidence in interests between you and Omo95 (it also shows that "technical manuals" isn't quite what your employer does). On top of that, there is of course the behavioural evidence on Wikipedia itself. In light of all this, I have to decline this request. Huon (talk) 13:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.