User talk:Zafarella

September 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tajiks. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 03:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zafarella (talk) 05:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)This is not personal opinion. Neither it is neutral point of view. In the university we had classes on history of the nation by people who dedicated their lifes to this subject. Sources unfortunately neither in english nor in any other mostly spread language.[reply]

This is that users misleading millions with disinformation. One says they are iranians, other says they are in afganistan, where they get the basis for this information?

How do you think jews will feel if you call them nazi?

I had better opinion about wikimedia/pedia, unfortunately it became garbage and flood of disinformation. I even regretting donating to this organization.

Revert those changes, they are not true neither they are neutral.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tajiks, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 06:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tajiks, you may be blocked from editing. "Remove wrong citation by influence of some fanatic iranian editor " is not an adequate explanation. Don't cast WP:aspersions, this kind of behavior in unacceptable in Wikipedia. Austronesier (talk) 07:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zafarella (talk) 13:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Austronesier (talk) You are not following the rules you have by reverting the changes. The correction are made in good faith for the page as citation was incorrect and single sourced, not reflecting the actual, true information. Consider making this page draft instead of showing incorrect misleading text to users. "Remove wrong citation by influence of some fanatic iranian editor" is very adequate and assertion is made for the reason as this editor made intentionally wrong citation from the source. Neither the iranian only source is correct source of information.  The information on the page is misleading.

I will not edit this page anymore. Neither will donate into your foundation anymore.

February 2021

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Tajiks for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Wario-Man ^talk 20:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions. Jeppiz (talk) 00:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]