Jump to content

User talk:Zaku kai

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Zaku kai, I'm looking at this post. You might want to call it AfD, not RfD. I believe RfD is Redirects for discussion. Maybe in the past RfD stood for something else? ~a (usertalkcontribs) 20:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you really need to discuses a deletion before going through with it. the gundam article needs to keep all of its real world info.Jeffpiatt 03:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dude, what the hell are you talking about? That bit about the S-Gundam was totally out of nowhere and had nothing to do with the Gundam. "Oh, by the way, a different designer had a similar experience on a different project ten years later". It is almost completely unrelated to the rest of the paragraph. Put it in the S-Gundam article if you like, it has nothing to do with Okawara's process of designing the original Gundam. Just the fact that the sentence had to begin in such a ridiculous way - "As a side note" - makes it clear that it doesn't belong. If it belonged there, it wouldn't need to be a side note, it'd be a proper part of the paragraph. And do learn how to write in discussion pages, please? Zaku kai 03:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Kryptonite

[edit]

Was the sarcasm in your edit summary really necessary? [1] --GentlemanGhost 18:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. But it felt good. I'd just come off some edits to the Lex Luthor article that really made my head hurt... Zaku kai 01:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I removed the prod for Planet Killer. I don't have a particular opinion on the page at the moment, but the article had previously been nominated for deletion, and thus WP:Prod doesn't apply. If you still feel that it warrants deletion, though, (and the discussion was a while ago in 2007), you can always nominate it for WP:AFD. - Bilby (talk) 23:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK. A bit confusing.  :) Zaku kai (talk) 04:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is, I'm afraid. :) The argument is that if the community previously discussed an article, and decided to keep it, it is no longer appropriate for a single person to request the article to be deleted via prod, and thus it has to return to AfD. It can still end up being deleted, and many article are - the process just needs to be open to community discussion. - Bilby (talk) 04:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]