User talk:Ziggy Coltrane

Template:Thunderbolts[edit]

Can you explain why you're removing content from Template:Thunderbolts. Ryan Miller 2 (talk) 20:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of South Park episodes, you may be blocked from editing. SanAnMan (talk) 00:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of South Park episodes‎, you may be blocked from editing. SanAnMan (talk) 21:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Ziggy Coltrane. Thank you for creating Animation Writers Caucus Animation Writing Award. User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your contribution. Please add additional references from independent and reliable media outlets and/or other sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pyrrho the Skipper}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 19:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop edit warring at Thor (Marvel Comics) and take your dispute to the article's talk page. -- MelanieN (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have NOT taken this dispute to the article's talk page as I advised. In the meantime I have removed your addition from the infobox, so as to restore the article to its condition before you started adding the disputed material. Be aware that if you add it to the infobox again, without first discussing and getting consensus, you are liable to be blocked for edit warring. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion on this matter, started by the IP, here. You should check it out, and add to it if you wish. So far there appears to be consensus against your addition. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About the Leader page[edit]

I'm sorry for making edit warrings on the Leader a few times. What I did was very wrong. I swear I didn't know that is nothing permanent in comics. Please forgive me. Sundropie (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Please stop edit warring on Darkseid and take your dispute to the article's talk page. -- JokEobard (talk) 21:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed a recent edit you made does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ziggy Coltrane: - hey, is the only reason behind you removing title from Don Cheadle's filmography is that they are unsourced? That's not an adequate reason for removal - if anything, the way to help the page is to find reliable sources to reference instead of just removal of content. LADY LOTUS • TALK 18:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Seth MacFarlane. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But there’s sources. What’s the issue?Ziggy Coltrane (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

The word filmmaker is not a suitable replacement for more accurate terminology used in the lede of the articles you are editing. This has been discussed in the past and use of the word was deprecated in favor of the more specific descriptions. If you want to start a new discussion at the film project to switch from the current wording please feel free to do so. MarnetteD|Talk 21:56, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright makes sense 2 me. Ziggy Coltrane (talk) 00:54, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Carolyn Lawrence, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 15:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

There is a discussion about you on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents that you should be aware of. Sqirm (talk) 16:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

You’re removing categories that aren’t irrelevant and you don’t even explain why you think they are. The ones I’m removing are redundant per WP:OVERCAT Sqirm (talk) 17:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lin-Manuel Miranda. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 04:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]