User talk:Zock2008

On Wikipedia, I spend a lot of time patrolling recent changes. If, while doing so, you believe I have made a mistake, please note: I am only human, I sometimes make mistakes. If you believe I have made a mistake, just undo my edit, and leave me a message pointing it out to me here. However, most often, I made a revert because an edit appears to be vandalism. A large, unexplained removal of content, without an edit summary, addition of common crude words, page blanking, or other things mentioned in the vandalism policy, I will most often revert. As said above, sometimes I make a mistake. Please let me know here. If you have vandalised, please do not leave me abusive messages. They will be deleted. And if you are here to vandalise my page because I reverted your edit, go right ahead. A few people watch my page, and your vandalism will be reverted promptly. The higher the vandalism level, the more strict. As said before, if I make a mistake, please tell me. Do not leave me template warnings.. I detest vandalism, and I strive to uphold Wikipedia's policies. If I have made an edit that appears to break policy, please don't leave me a template warning, leave me a message, and I'll explain my revert to you. Note- I do not mean to be harsh with this message. But I am tired of being vandalised because I clean up vandalism.

vn-22This user talk page has been vandalized 22 times.

Request to participate in University of Washington survey on tool to quickly understand Wikipedians’ reputations

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with some local Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Wikipedia) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal of those sessions was to gather feedback to help design an embedded application that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Wikipedia. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Wikipedia community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 01:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.

Possibly unfree File:TurboGrafx-16.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TurboGrafx-16.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mopenstein (talk) 20:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)