User talk:Zoogy691

August 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation was changed by Zoogy691 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947722 on 2018-08-30T16:26:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:26, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zoogy691, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Zoogy691! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Celine Dion, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The celebritynetworth.com website is not a reliable source. —C.Fred (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting my changez.I am writing the sources but you are deleting it. STOP IT!!!! Zoogy691 (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2018 (UTC) (as left at User talk:C.Fred)[reply]

The problem is, the source is not reliable. Celebritynetworth.com is not a reliable source. Do not change any celebrity's net worth unless you use a reliable source, like Forbes. —C.Fred (talk) 16:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Though you do need to be careful regarding Forbes as well as the website contains a wealth (pun intended!) of user-generated content. See Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources where the difference between between staff-written and user-generated content on Forbes website is explained.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Celine Dion. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Celine Dion. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:30, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You need to provide in-text citations for any updates you make if they aren't already supported by references used for a statement Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:49, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 10:30, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 10:35, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 05:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at President of the United States. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 06:18, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]