User talk:Zubair171

This edit (January 2008)[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 19:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Wine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Vcelloho (talk) 11:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to 2012 Summer Olympics, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tmol42 (talk) 12:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2012 Summer Olympics, you will be blocked from editing. Tmol42 (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wegotskill clan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wegotskill clan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Drmies (talk) 16:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zubair171. You have new messages at Tmol42's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Elliot. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 06:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zubair171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Account got hacked by a school kid

Decline reason:

The contribution history indicates that the account has only been used for vandalism by a school child, yes. But that isn't really 'hacking,' just the inappropriate creation and use of an account, and it isn't a reason to unblock this account, but a reason to leave it blocked. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:49, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.