User talk:Zuppeandsalad

Hey, Z, I just put up a possible consensus version of the Sonal Shah controversy section on the talk page. Please check it out. Kohl Gill (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-biog1|Pankaj Mishra|Please don't do it} —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indiancrusader (talk • contribs) 03:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello Zuppeandsalad, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

MBisanz Good luck, and have fun. --MBisanz ^talk 07:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Chittisinghpura Massacre[edit]

Will do, thanks for the heads-up! --vi5in^[talk] 21:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV[edit]

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If they continue to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! Grsz ¹¹ ^→Review! 02:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sonal Shah. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 03:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be aware that this article is covered by a community article probation documented at Talk:Barack Obama/Article probation. Further edit warring may result in a topic ban or other sanctions deemed necessary by any uninvolved administrator to prevent disruption. Jehochman ^Talk 15:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]