Wikipedia:Bitter stories made sweet
(Redirected from Wikipedia:BSMS)
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
Bitter stories are better sweet
[edit]- Sometimes and for some people, stream-of-consciousness expression of unpleasantness is easier than pleasant expression.
- Writing uncivil posts decreases the productivity of discussions.
- If one writer is careful to write a civil post, it is more beneficial to the project.
- Sometimes, it might be beneficial for an observer to offer a sweet (i.e. civil) version of an bitter (i.e. uncivil) written story.
- Providing a civil version of an uncivil statement, makes it easier for others to palate, though it is likely to have the opposite effect on the poster of the uncivil comment.
- The use of personal pronoun is not a prime factor in pleasantness.
- A previously posted uncivil segment of discussion may benefit from a collapse, or even removal in some circumstances. (WP:REFACTOR)
- An offered civil version should link to this essay.
- Examples of bitter post and sweeter alternative versions are:
Blah blah insult profanity blah blah.—User:Bitter (talk) 01:00, 1 July, 2015 (UTC)
WP:BSMS: Blah blah blah blah.—User:Bitter (talk) 01:00, 1 July, 2015 (UTC), sweetened by User:Sweet (talk) 02:00, 1 July, 2015 (UTC)
- A post can be shortened and sweetened simultaneously.
Blah blah insult blah blah profanity blah blah.—User:Wordy (talk) 01:00, 1 July, 2015 (UTC)
WP:LSMS and WP:BSMS: Blah blah blah.—User:Wordy (talk) 01:00, 1 July, 2015 (UTC), shortened and sweetened by User:Terse (talk) 02:00, 1 July, 2015 (UTC)
- Do not keep records of others bitter posts. (WP:POLEMIC)
- Remember that maintaining civility doesn't always mean being pleasant. Parliamentary language is acceptable (i.e. another editor must not be called a fool, but it may be said that their proposal is foolish; though it would be better to replace "foolish" with a phrase such as "ill conceived" or "totally unworkable").