Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Tim1357

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for BAG membership. Please do not modify it.

BAG Nomination: Tim1357[edit]

Tim1357 (talk · contribs)

Tim has been an editor for about six months now and runs several bot tasks. He has a good sense of working with others and responds to inquiries about his bots. Also, he helps comment at other bot requests. While early in his career here he did run an unregistered bot, he stopped when he found out the policy against it and has sought approval for all subsequent tasks. I believe that if elected Tim will continue to help BAG in reviewing and approving bots. MBisanz ^talk 18:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate acceptance:

I accept the nomination. Tim1357 (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Votes[edit]

Support MBisanz ^talk 18:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Need more BAG folks. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Of course. Tim1357 has been an extremely productive contributor the the bot process in the past few months. His comments have always been helpful, and they've always achieved a positive result. I'm confident that Tim will make an excellent addition to the team. (X! · talk) · @145 · 02:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, why not? — The Earwig @ 06:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - yep, no problems at all. Ale_Jrb ^talk 12:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - No qualms with this user at all. Very keen to help where he can. Killiondude (talk) 05:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, with some reservations. Should do well on the BAG. –blurpeace ^(talk) 05:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Supportive user that is helpful and knows the bot world well; has been instrumental in helping me, at the very minimum, getting concepts ready which will be necessary for future approval of a bot. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 01:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm sure he'll make a good addition to BAG. He certainly merits a pat on the back for User:DASHBot. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Closed. All looks fine, WJBscribe (talk) 15:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above BAG membership discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.