Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AnomieBOT 68

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

AnomieBOT 68[edit]

Operator: Anomie (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 23:41, Saturday April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Perl

Source code available: User:AnomieBOT/source/tasks/PUICloser.pm

Function overview: Update lists of pages with open discussions at WP:PUI

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:Possibly unfree files#Archive problem

Edit period(s): Hourly

Estimated number of pages affected: 1

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes

Function details: Someone recently asked me to have AnomieBOT start adding each day's page to WP:PUI#Holding cell, and when I went to check whether it could be covered by previous approvals I found AnomieBOT was never actually approved to remove completed days as it has been doing since February 2011.

Discussion[edit]

This, of course, updates AnomieBOT 18 and AnomieBOT 67. Assuming Legoktm restarts his bot, I don't intend to implement the "start adding each day's page" bit right now. But I'm asking approval to do that anyway, so I don't have to file yet another BRFA should AnomieBOT need to start doing it in the future. Anomie ⚔ 23:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems straight-forward, tedious task, in underpopulated area of Wikipedia, experienced, communicative bot operator (in spite of the oops, whatever). Even if not implemented, approval would probably be okay. -68.107.137.178 (talk) 08:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (15 edits or 5 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 09:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can we just use these as the 15 edits? [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Anomie ⚔ 15:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? They're all recent enough. I checked a few, they look fine. I find it hard to check these ultra-tedious bot tasks, though, so maybe someone could run through all 15, but it looks good, imo. -68.107.137.178 (talk) 08:57, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. It looks like people have taken the week off at PUF, no dates were completed during the five days. But see above. Anomie ⚔ 11:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 09:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.