Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot 2 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Withdrawn by operator.
Operator: Chris
Automatic or Manually assisted: Auto
Programming language(s): PHP, my classes
Source code available: yes
Function overview: Remapping the old sockpuppet templates to the new single template
Edit period(s): One time
Estimated number of pages affected:
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): N
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function details: Full details of the remapping here
Discussion
[edit]It's a suitable bot task, but I notice that there is some debate between two templates to be used as replacements. Avi and Foxy Loxy have each come up with a template, but I'm not seeing a specific consensus for which one should be used. I'd suggest we wait until consensus and the operation of the template are clearer, since here, some of which occurred after the filing of this BRFA, there is some debate about the use of the templates and whether there should be one, two, different flags, etc. Fritzpoll (talk) 16:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- {{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Have the above issues been addressed? Anomie⚔ 03:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm trying to clarify the current situation - Wikipedia_talk:Sockpuppet_investigations#Sockpuppet Template Remapping --Chris 11:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. Any update on the outcome of the discussion? MBisanz talk 23:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm trying to clarify the current situation - Wikipedia_talk:Sockpuppet_investigations#Sockpuppet Template Remapping --Chris 11:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by operator. --Chris 07:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.