Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 51

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Withdrawn by operator.

DannyS712 bot 51[edit]

Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 05:19, Saturday, June 29, 2019 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Finish merging WikiProject Waterfalls into WikiProject Rivers as a task force

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests#Finish WikiProject merge by updating talk templates

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: ~1000

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: For pages that currently transclude {{WikiProject Waterfalls}} or a redirect to it:

If the page doesn't have {{WikiProject Rivers}} then remove the WP:Waterfalls template and replace it with WP:Rivers with |waterfalls=yes.
If the page already has {{WikiProject Rivers}} then remove the WP:Waterfalls template and add |waterfalls=yes to the WP:Rivers template.

Discussion[edit]

@Ajpolino: filed --DannyS712 (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like this was discussed and agreed upon here and here, pursuant to Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/Task forces#Converting existing projects to task forces. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Primefac (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Umm, @JJMC89 already made the 1071 edits that this task covered - see 1000 and other 71. I guess this request has expired...? --DannyS712 (talk) 20:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aye, Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:WikiProject_Waterfalls shows no more transclusions to mend and what is left can be handled manually. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: yeah, that's how I found this - I went to make a list with AWB and got 0 transclusions --DannyS712 (talk) 20:36, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by operator. No longer needed. Primefac (talk) 01:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.