Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Emijrpbot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

Emijrpbot[edit]

Operator: Emijrp (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 14:21, Monday, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: github

Function overview: Bot checks errors and prose for articles submitted to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Dr. Blofeld request

Edit period(s): hourly or so

Estimated number of pages affected: About 10

Namespace(s): "Wikipedia:" , "Wikipedia_talk" namespace

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Function details:

Bot for contest lists maintenance (example list). It will check article length, format errors, references, etc.

Discussion[edit]

Approved for trial (30 edits or 7 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. This is OK to trial, edits are limited to Wikipedia: , Wikipedia_talk:, and the bot's own User:/User_talk: pages and subpages. Please post the results of your trial here when done testing. — xaosflux ^Talk 10:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Xaosflux. @Emirjp: When do you want to do a trial? I will arrange a few people to help do a trial.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: I did some test edits and improved the code a bit. emijrp (talk) 09:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Emijrp: I'm expecting this will be low-volume, do you need a bot flag for this? (Do you want to avoid the edits in recent changes/watchlists for 'hidebots'?) — xaosflux ^Talk 14:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: I think it is better with flag, edits will happen hourly over a month. emijrp (talk) 15:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. low-volume, non-article impacting - no fuss, no muss. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.