Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Hot Riley Bot
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Denied.
Operator: Hot Riley (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 21:00, Sunday, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual:Supervised
Programming language(s):Java
Source code available:AWB
Function overview:Reverts vandalism
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s):Daily
Estimated number of pages affected:1000
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No):Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No):No
Function details: This bot Reverts vandalism i know this is what Clue Bot Does and my request was right the last time the only thing i did wrong was the Bots name
Sorry Riley Huntley for Trying to Copy your bot Now anyway Come to this page ASAP
Discussion
[edit]Okay so my Last request was Rejected because the bots name was the same as Riley Huntleys bot
So This Bot needs a Trial
- {{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} - Your request and listing have been malformed, and this clearly contains "Vague or incomplete details" - do you have a serious task description to add? Quick aside: how do you plan to use the AWB framework for general anti-vandalism? — xaosflux Talk 23:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The user account this request is for is also listed as the Operator, but the account name does not clearly indicate that the account is a bot and the account has very few edits. Please note that WP:Bot policy states that a bot account's username should make it immediately clear that the account is in fact a bot, which is normally done by having the account name end with the word "Bot". Also note that a bot may not operate itself, so the Operator field should identify the account of the human running the bot. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It Reverts Vandalism Using Twinkle
- That's not even close to being clear enough for a trial. Please provide a walk through of how your bot will work (process flow). — xaosflux Talk 23:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Denied. Bottom line, this is not going to happen. Your own personal recent records of vandalizes articles preclude you from running a vandalism-related bot for anytime in the near future. — xaosflux Talk 23:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.