Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Yobot 46

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Denied.

Yobot 46

Operator: Magioladitis (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 13:05, Thursday, February 2, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): AWB / WPCleaner

Source code available:

Function overview: Fix Redirects with incorrect syntax

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Monthly

Estimated number of pages affected: 5 pages per month

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details:

Discussion

Could you provide details of what "incorrect syntax" means? What are the exact fixes being made here? ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:28, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The task is not specified, but I don't think bot approval is needed for a task that only involves 60 pages a year. These can be fixed by hand instead of by a bot. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CBM This would be OK if we had to do only 1 small task and not about 200 small tasks. 114 tasks are in CHECKWIKI's lists and 80 more arr in my to-do lists which I 'll submit for BRFAs. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Rob, could you elaborate? In my opinion the "function details" should never be empty — MusikAnimal ^talk 01:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Denied. You haven't bothered to fill out the BRFA form completely, or people wouldn't have to be asking you what "incorrect syntax" means. Once your current backlog of open BRFAs is taken care of, feel free to come back with a full-specified BRFA. Anomie ⚔ 02:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.