Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 June 8
June 8[edit]
Category:Danish economy, Category:Indian economy, and Category:Romanian economy[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 13:23, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Rename to Category:Economy of Denmark, Category:Economy of India, and Category:Economy of Romania, respectively, so they will match the rest of the subcategories of Category:National economies. Neutralitytalk 20:33, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Note: Standard contradicts the one applied in Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Battles_in_Foo_.2F_Fooish_Battles. Sebastian (talk) 06:06, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)
- Wasn't that one still under dispute? Anyway there's no difference between Economy of and in Denmark, but there is a difference between battles fought in or by a country. Agree with Neutrality. Radiant_>|< 07:19, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
- It is the "Battles of Foo" categories that are a deliberate exception to the rule, for the reason of differences between nationality of combatants and location of battle. Most other categories are changing or have been changed to "X in Foo" or "X of Foo", depending on normal grammatical usage or fairly straightforward rules of thumb. The reason that is brought up on the rare occasions that someone objects to this is the very good one - it is often difficult to guess what a nationality calls itself. "Economy of Monaco", "Economy of Burkina Faso", "Economy of Kiribati" is far simpler than having to remember "Monegasque economy", "Burkinabe economy", "Gilbertese economy" etc. Grutness...wha? 13:34, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Now THAT's consensus building. Rename. --Kbdank71 14:19, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category:National economies[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 13:27, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Rename to Category:Economy by country, like the rest of the subcategories of Category:Categories by country. Neutralitytalk 20:33, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Agree, though is there a reason it shouldn't be Economies by Country?. -- Lochaber 16:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry, that's what I meant to type. Must have been distracted. Neutralitytalk 01:30, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Agree with Lochaber. Radiant_>|< 07:19, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Agree: Rename to "by country". Sebastian (talk) 07:56, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)
- Sorry, that's what I meant to type. Must have been distracted. Neutralitytalk 01:30, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category:Gundam technology[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:49, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This category is obsolete; all articles have been moved to the respective articles of the various timelines, and even if some new technology could be added or expanded strong enough to have its page, it should belong to the category of the respective Gundam timeline. --IgorTrieste 11:44, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- There's still stuff that doesn't fit in any timeline. 132.205.44.134 22:27, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Okay, where do you propose to put that? Something like Gundam technology outside timeline? Radiant_>|< 07:19, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
- There can be a single article, in the general Gundam category (above the timelines), there is no need for a whole category of articles about technology --IgorTrieste 09:44, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category:Labor strikes[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:18, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Based on contents, should be Category:Labor disputes, as it contains both strikes and lockouts. – flamurai (t) 07:01, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category:Companies for commercial item transport and distribution[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 13:57, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Quite an unweildy title. I would suggest renaming it to a slightly smaller one that fits better with the others: Category:Commercial transport and distribution companies instead. --Hooperbloob 01:10, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support renaming. Postdlf 16:36, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I suggest Category:Transport and distribution companies. What does the word "commercial" add? Is there a separate category for uncommercial transport and distribution companies, or for those that won't take contracts from not for profit organisations? I think not. CalJW 17:21, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support CalJW's version - the shorter, the better. -- BD2412 talk 22:37, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category:Cable television shows[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:53, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Erroneously listed on VfD by User:MakeRocketGoNow. Edit summary for addition of VfD template was "category is overly broad and better served by existing Category:Television series by network)". — Gwalla | Talk 00:24, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for above reasons. Postdlf 18:55, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Pavel Vozenilek 17:12, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.