Jump to content

Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Macedonia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page served for a centralised discussion, during June/July 2009, about Macedonia-related naming issues, in particular:

  • What should be the conventions for page titles of sub-articles dealing with the country or the other Macedonias?
  • What should be the conventions for referring to the country from other articles?

Process

[edit]

This discussion process was inititated by the Arbitration Committee through a decision in the "Macedonia 2" case. It was to create a new binding guideline for Macedonia-related naming issues, to supercede the old attempt known as WP:MOSMAC, which failed to reach consensus in 2007. The process was overseen by three referees: Fritzpoll (talk · contribs), J.delanoy (talk · contribs), and Shell Kinney (talk · contribs).

During a first phase of the process, participants were invited to work together to establish an outline of the issues to be decided, by assembling a set of alternative proposals, each with a concise summary presentation of the arguments for and against. They also assembled a commonly agreed background-introduction section for new readers (see below), and evidence to back up their proposals (see navigation sidebar).

In a second phase, a brief poll was held to filter the proposals down to a smaller number that were to be presented to the wider community.

In a third phase, the proposals were presented for comments and endorsements from the wider community through an RFC.

In determining the results, the referees were instructed by the Arbitration Committee to "disregard any opinion which does not provide a clear and reasonable rationale explained by reference to the principles of naming conventions and of disambiguation, or which is inconsistent with the principles of the neutral point of view policy or the reliable sources guideline."[1]

The referees announced their determination of consensus on 8 July 2009, at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Macedonia/consensus.

Structure

[edit]

The discussions were held at several sub-pages dealing with separate issues. In the current phase, participants are invited to work together to establish an outline of the issues to be decided, by assembling a set of alternative proposals, each with a concise summary presentation of the arguments for and against. Some rules of conduct are outlined here.

Other pages:

  • evidence is for presenting factual evidence in support of proposals.
  • Nationalities and affiliations: a page where some participants have voluntarily provided statements disclosing their national affiliations, for transparency.

Principles

[edit]

The discussion process was installed in response to an Arbitration Committee decision at WP:ARBMAC2, which says:


[edit]

Arbitration cases:

  • WP:ARBMAC2 – Arbitration case regarding the Macedonia naming dispute
  • WP:ARBMAC - Older arbitration case

Policies and guidelines listed as relevant in ARBMAC2 decision:

Other guidelines:

  • WP:NCON – Specialised guideline for naming conflicts
  • WP:NCGN – Specialised guideline for geographical names

  • WP:MOSMAC – An old essay that aimed to be a specialised naming guideline for Macedonia topics, but failed to reach consensus.
  • Talk:Greece/Naming poll – March 2009 discussion and poll about reference to the neighbouring country in the Greece article.

Principles quoted from ARBMAC2:


Background

[edit]
Macedonia
  • There are four principal meanings of the term "Macedonia" pertinent to this discussion:
  • The state formally calls itself the "Republic of Macedonia" (its "constitutional name", i.e. as formally established in its constitution)[1], informally just "Macedonia".
  • The Greek government disputes the historical appropriateness of this name and demands the adoption of a composite name with some geographical qualifier.[2] Some parties in Greece reject any use of "Macedonia" in the country's name.
  • As a consequence of the naming dispute, the UN in 1993 admitted the state as "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (explicitly noting that this was not supposed to be a "name", but what the UN called a "provisional reference"[3][4][5]).
  • Most other international organisations have followed UN usage or variants of it, as have several dozen UN member states.
  • Just under two-thirds of UN member states (125 out of 192) have recognised the country under its constitutional name of "Republic of Macedonia".[6] This includes all of the major English-speaking nations except Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.[5]
  • Three quarters of the countries of Europe use Republic of Macedonia for bilateral purposes individually sourced here.
  • Proposed diplomatic solutions to the political conflict have envisaged that the country should adopt some qualifying adjective as part of its official name for use in international contexts, e.g. "North Macedonia" or "Nova Makedonija" ("New Macedonia")[7]. It cannot presently be predicted how common English usage worldwide would reflect a new settlement, if one were reached in the near future.
  • The following facts about usage are largely agreed upon:
    • The state's most frequent name in common English usage is simply "Macedonia".[8]
    • In common present-day English usage in general-purpose sources, when the name "Macedonia" is used it is most often referring to the country.[9] [10]
    • In academic literature predating 1995 as well as in older common English usage, the name is used in other meanings, especially that of the ancient kingdom. In academic literature after 1995, usage has generally shifted to the country, although other meanings still occur in specific contexts.[11]
    • Wikipedia's article on the country receives much more page hits than all other Macedonia articles (roughly 5 times more than Macedonia (ancient kingdom), 10 times more than Macedonia (Greece), 20 times more than Macedonia (region), and 3 times more than all these together.)[12]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ [1]
  2. ^ [2]
  3. ^ http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/47/a47r225.htm
  4. ^ Jochen Abr. Frowein, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 1997, p. 239. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998
  5. ^ "Use of the provisional reference “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” at the Council of Europe". Council of Europe Doc. 11524, 8 February 2008
  6. ^ "FM Milososki: Name row a result of Greece's desire to protect its myth of pure nation". the fact that 125 countries in the world have recognised Macedonia's constitutional name is a clear signal that the country has international support. See also [3] and [4].
  7. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonia_naming_dispute#The_newest_proposal_and_reactions
  8. ^ http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&&hl=en&q=macedonia
  9. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise/MOSMAC2#Reference_works
  10. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise/MOSMAC2#Cartographic_usage
  11. ^ http://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=macedonia&wc=on&dc=All+Disciplines
  12. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise/MOSMAC2#Page_view_statistics