Wikipedia:Editor review/Minun

User:Minun[edit]

Minun (talk · contribs) I have been really trying to help Wikipedia, but I feel I need a lot of feedback and help in order to bacome a better editor. Please write comments, cheers —M in un ^Spiderman 15:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

I strongly urge you to take it easy, in light of your ongoing RfA. Esperanza's coffee lounge can be great for relieving stress - and please remember to never make personal attacks (or anything that could be interpreted as such), for any reason. As far as editing goes, I'd recommend you get a little more involved in the Talk space when contributing major edits to article pages, since it's always good to tell people exactly what you're doing. They'll appreciate it, believe me. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 10:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your advice. Anyway, by RfA did you mean RFAR (Requests for arbitration)? —Minun ^{Spiderman • Review Me} 15:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oops - yes, I did. My bad. :) RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 03:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage (Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off. Please consider using Flcelloguy's Tool or Interiot's Tool 2)
User's current editing statistics according to Flcelloguy's tool. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 10:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics for: Minun
(Permissions: N/A)
- Total: 2664 -
Main: 988
Talk: 128
User: 291
User talk: 549
Wikipedia: 416
Wikipedia talk: 135
Image: 38
Template: 74
Template talk: 8
Help: 1
Category: 6
Portal: 30
-------------------
Total edits: 2664
w/ edit summary: 2502 (93.91%*)
w/ manual edit summary: 2382 (89.41%*)
Minor edits: 136 (5.1%*)
First known edit: Jun 30, 2006
-------------------
* - percentages are rounded down to the nearest hundredth.
-------------------

I would more recommend Essjay's tool —M in un ^Spiderman 15:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly editor with a lot of potential. EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 15:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was a little upset about a very silly thing, where Minun failed an article I worked hard on, Trobairitz, for GA because of what I perceived as a very small problem with the format of the references. I asked Minun about it, and did not receive an answer as to why the article was failed, rather than simply put on hold. In the future, if someone has a concern with your actions, even if that concern is totally unfounded, it is polite to respond. Also, I wouldn't call having an ArbCom case concerning your actions a small matter, it comes off as dishonest. Mak (talk) 16:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I didn't relise you needed a reply, aplology —M in un ^{Spiderman • Review Me} 18:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
I mainly like all my contributions, but, however, I do have a particular type of contributions I like best. I particular like ones which result in barnstars because it proves im becoming a good editor —M in un ^Spiderman 15:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I did have a small problem, but its way over now so I have nothing to worry about —M in un ^Spiderman 15:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Full disclosure: Minun has an RFAR ongoing. I personally think Minun is a model Wikipedian and that the RFAR discusses past behaviour which he does not engage in now. ~ crazytales56297 -talk- 18:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, im a bit concerned about what will happen next, but I know what to do, cheers —M in un ^{Spiderman • Review Me} 18:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very good work mate. Look forward to working with you in the future Wiki assassin 11:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]