Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Carnivàle
| Main page | Articles |
 Carnivàle
|
List of Carnivàle episodes -  Characters of Carnivàle - Mythology of Carnivàle
|
Self-nom Inspired by the Kingdom Hearts FT, I chose my then favorite TV series to try if a full FT is also possible for TV shows. Carnivàle is covered in whole in four articles - one for the overview and general production, one for the plot, one for the characters, and one for the meaning. As the show is probably among the most complex TV shows ever produced, a newbie reader (or even fan) would probably still need to read and jump between the three subarticles to "get it" (that's also why I wrote these articles - I didn't "get" the show and wanted to share my new online findings with others). I think the two GA articles are very close to FA (I have the intention to take the Characters articles to FAC sometime in the near future), so I don't anticipate any opposition for missing gaps. I also had a peer review, with only minor suggestions for changes. The prose is still getting tweaked all the time. I know that WP:WIAFT recommends a template, but the topic's template (something like this) was TfD'ed back in August, with the deletion rationale still somewhat applying. Anyway, please fire away. – sgeureka t•c 18:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support - The series seems fascinating, makes me want to watch this show....Back to the nomination, it looks comprehensive, half the articles are featured, and it would be a neat addition to the Featured Topic list. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support Nice work, especially with the mythology article. –thedemonhog talk • contributions 23:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support - meets all the criteria. Superb work. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 03:18, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support, as GA Reviewer of Mythology of Carnivàle. Good work all around. Cirt (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC).
- Support, Very nice work. Silver Sonic Shadow (talk) 03:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support as an occasional contributor I have been very impressed with the improvement in these articles and they are the definitive source of information about this show.--Opark 77 (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support A strong group of articles. Qjuad (talk) 23:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support There is an incredible amount of research done in these articles. This is the right grouping for this topic.-BillDeanCarter (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Promote --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 08:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)