Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Family Guy (season 5)/archive1

Family Guy (season 5)[edit]

The topic covers all of the episodes produced and aired during the fifth season of the animated comedy series Family Guy. I would like to promote this topic to good topic, as I believe it meets all of the criteria. Gage (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Fails criteria #3 ("Each article is of high quality, including the referencing."). Sorry, but the first few ones I took a look at are in a serious need of a copyedit. I've requested reassessments of the first two articles I looked at due to their poor quality. Ω phois 09:52, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ophois review. JJ98 (talk) 04:39, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ actually. I went through the articles and at a first glance, they don't appear to me as seriously failing the GA criteria. Only Chick Cancer appears to need some touchups. For this and since this is a GTC (and probably a FT in probably forever) I don't mind this being a GT. Plus, some older Simpsons seasons or older similar topics are not in better shape. Nergaal (talk) 20:53, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, while there may be the odd hiccup with some of the episodes, the articles in this topic have seen some improvement over the past couple of weeks, and I feel it might be ready. -- Matthew RD 17:38, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Nergaal and Matthew...the articles all look good. CTJF83 chat 06:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per nom. Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 16:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The articles are written in an unencyclopedic style which encourages primary source material and pop culture ahead of encyclopedic content, scholarship and analysis from independent reliable secondary sources. FT Candidates should be supporting the five pillars, not undermining them. I could easily quote the poor prose and sourcing in these articles if necessary, but do not wish to cause unnecessary embarrassment to those supporting the articles in this topic. Flaws can be found in many of them. Geometry guy 23:08, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Hell Comes to Quahog" has been delisted as a good article. Ω phois 22:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural oppose because, with one article no longer a GA, it simply no longer meets the criteria. Drop me a line if the article manages to get back to GA while this remains open -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Closing as failed; withdrawn nomination. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]