Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/2016 log

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kept

[edit]

Ipswich Town F.C.

[edit]

Fails 3a (point 2) and 1d of the criteria as Ipswich Town F.C. Hall of Fame is not an FL and Ipswich Town F.C. Youth Academy is not a FA/GA. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:05, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Great, thanks. I'll work on the HoF, and the Academy page is now proposed for merging into the main topic page, it should not exist as a standalone article at this point. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please note that since I already have a couple of candidates at FLC, I am prohibited from nominating any more, so as long as this removal candidate can remain open for a couple of months, I'm content to do the work to secure its inclusion. FLC is slow-going at this time so it's unlikely that I'll get much out of that process for a month. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And with that, this review is closed to have the topic retain its status and add Ipswich Town F.C. Hall of Fame to the topic. - GamerPro64 01:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen Stefani albums

[edit]

Since the article for her most recent album, This Is What the Truth Feels Like, failed its GAN recently, I am nominating this topic for failing to meet criterion 3.b and 1.d. GamerPro64 02:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will be working heavily on her newest album to bring it to GA–status within this week, but I've been really caught up with the GA Cup. Is there anyway you could allow me a little time to improve it? Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  • Comment GamerPro64, the article is being heavily worked on as we speak, so it will be up for a nomination within the week, however, I will be out of country from July 8–21, and will have limited internet access. I just thought I'd give you a heads up. Thanks!! Carbrera (talk) 22:42, 1 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep for now. I see nothing wrong with waiting until the end of July when Carbrera is back editing, and will try to improve the new article. Mattximus (talk) 02:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The article will be nominated for GA review within the week. Thanks to you all for cooperating and being patient. Carbrera (talk) 03:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @GamerPro64: The article was recently reviewed by a different Wikipedia user who passed it today, August 3rd. Since now all five of her albums are GA quality or higher, I believe this discussion can now close since all articles meet criteria 3b and 1d. Thanks. Carbrera (talk) 03:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]
All right. I can close this discussion and add "This Is What the Truth Feels Like" to the topic. GamerPro64 13:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Slayer discography

[edit]

I am nominating this topic for removal as it has passed its retention period for Repentless, which has not achieved at least GA status three months after the album's release, so the topic is no longer complete, thus failing criteria 1(d). GamerPro64 19:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Demoted

[edit]

Para-skiing classification

[edit]

This topic was promoted in this form. On November 4, Fram performed this edit removing 13 articles that were delisted from GA status. If those 13 articles were thought to be in the topic when promoted, I don't see how this topic is complete and it therefore is not compliant with the criteria, specifically 3. (b) (ii). I know there is normally a grace period, but with 13 articles not up to standard, I don't think it is required. Note that two of the three current articles are also GARs. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 05:10, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable to me. We need to get someone assigned to re-submit the articles. I'll raise the issue in Perth. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:37, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Director comment - If a topic loses Good Articles they're not supposed to be removed from the topic unless the article was deleted or merged into another article. I restored the topic to normal with obvious icon differences. GamerPro64 14:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - pretty clear, almost all were demoted. Mattximus (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delist: Almost all of the articles were demoted so it should be delisted. Aoba47 (talk) 20:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

National Hockey League awards

[edit]

Mark Messier Leadership Award, after having ten recipients of the award now, has not been nominated at FLC. And with the three month grace period being up I think that this topic should be demoted based on criterion 3.a. GamerPro64 16:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gillingham F.C.

[edit]

Fails 1d and 3a (point 2) of the criteria as List of Gillingham F.C. players (1–24 appearances) isn't a FL and List of Gillingham F.C. players (25–49 appearances) isn't an FL (although it is a FLC). - Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's the timescale for this? As noted, the 25-49 list is currently at FLC. The 1-24 list doesn't need much work to the list itself, but has a large number of redlinked entries. I'm not up to date with what the rules are on proportions of redlinks in a FL..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude: Ultimately it is up to the coordinators but If there is obvious activity I don't see why this couldn't stay open for a couple of months. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, well as noted the 25-49 list is already at FLC and I see no reason why it shouldn't pass (it's already had one support). I'll start blitzing through creating the articles on the redlinked players so that the 1-24 list is ready to go straight to FLC as soon as the other one closes (or gains significant support)........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just as an update, the 25-49 list is going well at FLC, and the 1-24 list should be able to head there next week with a bit of luck......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
......and now the other one is at FLC too -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:52, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Update The 1-24 list has failed at FLC, so I guess the topic now can't be saved..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Road to ... (Family Guy)

[edit]

Fails 1d and 3b of the criteria as Road to India isn't a GA. Nickag989talk 22:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé studio albums

[edit]

The retention period for Lemonade (Beyoncé album) has come and gone so this topic fails to meet criterion 3.b and 1.d. GamerPro64 21:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James Bond films

[edit]

I am nominating this topic for removal as it has passed its retention period for Spectre (2015 film), which has not achieved at least GA status more than three months after its release, so the topic is no longer complete, thus failing criteria 1(d). GamerPro64 16:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article in question is currently at GAN. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kanye West studio albums

[edit]

I am nominating this topic for removal as it has passed its retention period for The Life of Pablo, which has not achieved at least GA status three months after its release, so the topic is no longer complete, thus failing criterion 1(d) and 3(b). GamerPro64 01:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]