Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2004 Atlantic hurricane season/archive2

A renomination after nearly 17 months of improvement. I think it is ready this time. CrazyC83 15:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "Seasonal forecasts" section is a bit choppy. Is it possible to write this in longer paragraphs? - Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support. But I think the related articles box can be removed, as it has only one article listed. íslenskur fellibylur #12 _(samtal) 21:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the layout seems kind of messy, for example is it really necessary to have external links in text to the NHC for every hurricane, given that every huricane has its own article?--Peta 02:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lots of improvement since last nom, I also agree with Icelandic (remove related articles box). Hello32020 02:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak object; well writen in general, but with a few MOS violations (using seasons in place of early/mid/late 2004) and some of the citations, especially number of deaths and damage, could do with being placed at the first instance of the data (in this case the intro) rather than halfway down the page. If these are fixed, then support. La ï ka 15:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support if only with solidarity for my previous failed nom. ;) Looks good. --Golbez 20:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a featured article, it's good, I'm giving my support. Hello32020 10:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, improved noticably, more comprehensive, well-written. - Mailer Diablo 13:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very comprehensive, a great deal of references that ensures factuality, very informative. --Cliff smith 03:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]