Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2021 British Open/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 31 May 2022 [1].


2021 British Open[edit]

Nominator(s): Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about the first snooker event of the 2021-22 snooker season. The British Open returned to the calendar after 17 years away! There was two maximum breaks, and was won by a dazzling Mark Williams. First round contest between seperated couple Mark Allen and Reanne Evans had some controversy as Evans refused to shake hands.

A really great event. A little shorter than some of my other events, due to the shortened frame lengths, but nothing should be missing. Let me know your thoughts Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Image review not sure about File:British Open 2021 Poster.jpg. This is not like an album cover or official logo; it's unclear how many people have seen this poster and to what extent it is necessary to identify the event. Other image licensing looks ok. (t · c) buidhe 18:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Coord note: We're almost at 3 weeks and without progress towards promotion the nomination is likely to be archived in the next few days. (t · c) buidhe 12:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see what I can do. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, it's been a fortnight and the nom seems to have stalled, so I'm going to archive. Given there was only one comprehensive review I'm prepared to reduce the usual two-week pause before a new nom to one week -- I don't think throwing straight back into the mix will help much. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from BennyOnTheLoose[edit]

  • Some inconsistency between BBC/BBC Sport/bbc.co.uk in ref formatting
  • Inconsistency in whether sites are referred to by name or url, e.g. The Guardian, and Eurosport; but also www.sportinglife.com and www.scotsman.com
  • Why "|quote=Sport Cast" for ref name="wst._HowT" ?
  • Capital T for the Guardian.

Format

  • Suggest moving ref after "won by Alex Higgins," to after won by "Silvino Francisco" as the 1980 source can't verify that the British Gold Cup was later the British Open.
  • "which changed names" seems awkward straight after "Higgins,"
  • "broadcast by: ITV Sport" - ITV4 according to the source. Looks like ITV Sport is a producer rather than broadcaster.
  • Why are some broadccasters redlinked and others not?
    • So I've done some research, and these are the ones I might be able to make an article about. The other ones I'm less sure of. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refs [5][2] are out of order. (Porbably look at this after other changes, in case sequence changes)
  • "Matches were played as the best-of-five frames, until the quarter-finals and semi-finals, which were played as best-of-seven-frame matches, and the final as a best-of-eleven" - doesn't quite work, I feel. Maybe "..matches. The final was best-of-eleven."?

Tournament summary

  • "maximum break in the first frame" - I like commas so would have "maximum break, in the first frame", but you can wait and see what better writers say.
  • "The pair who had fought over child maintenance, had their first professional meeting at the event" - comma after pair. Maybe a different word like "players" instead of "pair" here, given the context?
  • I'm not sure about "fought over child maintenance", might benefit from rewording
  • "but missed match ball" - feels like it's missing a word
  • "allowing Allen to win the contest" - probably add that he had to pot something to do this; it wasn't automatic after Evans missed.
  • "Both of the finalists of the 2021 World Snooker Championship, Shaun Murphy and Mark Selby met in the first round." How about "The finalists from the 2021 World Snooker Championship, ..."?
  • "his first main tournament win since retiring in 2012" - add something about him coming out of retirment, for people who donp;t pay close attention to his career.
  • "behind to Dominic Dale to win 3–2." Could reword to avoid the to-to.
  • "after missing a shot, because the red ball had a stray hair on it." - expand slightly. It wasn't a direct cause, was it?
  • "but lost 0–3 as neither player made a break above 50" - I'd prefer "but lost 0–3. Neither player made a break above 50"
  • "Trump played Elliot Slessor, but lost 2–3" - why "but"? Same question for "Wilson played Slessor, but trailed 0–2" and, in the picture caption, "but lost 2–3"
  • "3–1 win over defending champion Higgins" - "defending champion" was mentioned in the first paragraph of the section, so can probably be removed here.
  • "the sole player remaining within the top 16" - how about "the sole player from the top 16 remaining"?
  • Could wikilink 1997 to 1997 British Open in the body.
  • Could, optionally, add a cuegloss link to "deciding frame"

Tournament draw

  • "Kurt Maflin withdrew from the event (denoted by w/d), his opponent received a walkover (w/o)" - use a full stop rather than a comma, or add something like "so"
  • I suggest adding the direct link to the final score ([2]) as a reference to the final.
  • Add an explanation of the bold and parenthesised numbers in the final. (The intro only has "players in bold denote match winners.")
  • What's the source for "Referee: Leo Scullion"?

Infobox and Lead

  • "It was the 27th edition of the British Open event," doesn't seem to be cited in the body
  • "this broke with the tradition of most ranking tournaments which use a seeded draw under single-elimination tournament format." isn't covered in the article body

Comments above, Lee Vilenski. As always, feel free to challenge any. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.