Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/7th Infantry Division (United States)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 02:00, 3 August 2009 [1].

7th Infantry Division (United States)[edit]

Nominator(s): —Ed!^(talk) 14:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Easily passed MILHIST A-class review. I believe all major points meet FA criteria. —Ed!^(talk) 14:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Done; thanks. ~~Images need alt text as per WP:ALT. Except for the purely-decorative tiny icons, which should have "|link=" instead of alt text (see WP:ALT #When to specify).~~ Eubulides (talk) 23:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. —Ed!^(talk) 18:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks, a very nice job on the images you did. But 3 images still need alt text: the Ingman portrait and the two maps. For the maps, I suggest briefly summarizing the gist of what the maps show rather than go into a lot of detail. (A general on the phone asks you to describe each map in 40 words or less: what do you say?) Eubulides (talk) 03:16, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Added. (for the maps, I forgot to put the "alt" in the caption) How does it look now? -—Ed!^(talk) 03:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - It looks good. Thanks. Eubulides (talk) 06:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments -
~~You've mixed using the Template:Citation with the templates that start with Cite such as Template:Cite journal or Template:Cite news. They shouldn't be mixed per WP:CITE#Citation templates~~
What makes the following reliable sources?
- ~~http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/Inf/07thInfantryDivision.htm~~
- ~~http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/apomeara.htm~~

Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the Template: Citation. As for the two websites, the first is self-explanatory. tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil is a US Military website and part of the Pentagon's network, as evident from the address. I switched the arlington.net ref (#114) to a more reliable source: an article in the Washington Post. —Ed!^(talk) 19:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.