Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of Rennell Island

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Battle of Rennell Island[edit]

I respectfully self-nominate this article on a naval battle from World War II for Featured Article consideration. The article was peer reviewed, reviewed under the guidelines at WP:WTA, and received key edits by Wwoods and others. Cla68 18:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, excellent article (as usual!) Kirill Lokshin 18:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Another excellent war article. You guys are awesome. RyanGerbil10 (Drop on in!) 19:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on wheels. A great article! -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 19:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, beautifully written. - Mailer Diablo 19:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, enthusiastically; I wish there were more folks doing philosophy or cinema articles with the care and attention to detail that many of these war articles get. Anyway, a very high quality article. Reimelt 20:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, a nice and well-written battle article. Staxringold talkcontribs 21:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Well written, informative article! Good work! -- Underneath-it-All 21:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Rebecca 04:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Maps should be converted to SVG format if possible. WP 05:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. --Dwaipayan (talk) 15:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Spectacular.UberCryxic 16:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support --Shane (talk/contrib) 18:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is an excellent article. --Nick Dowling 10:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll support when you replace the map that spells "Sydney" as "Sidney". Tony 13:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Cla68 15:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. ^_^ -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 16:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support another great one from the MILHIST project.Rlevse 21:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]