Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Brisbane/archive1

Well written, informed article of this transforational city. Mathieumcguire 00:54, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to peer review, this is not how a city article should look and it is missing basic information, and references.--nixie 01:13, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- See Johannesburg for an example of a featured city article.--The Brain of Morbius 01:45, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Refer to peer review: it has a long way to go.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 05:29, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Peer review - I agree it's missing a lot, in fact missing such basic necessities as references. I live in Brisbane too, and the main impression I get is that the article doesn't really represent the Brisbane that I know. That may be POV on my part - I'd have to read it through several times to be sure. Move it to peer review and I'll be happy to discuss my thoughts further, because here is not the place to do that in detail. I've heard of "Brissie", I've heard of "BrisVegas" but I've never heard of "Brisneyland". I should get out more perhaps. ;-) Rossrs 10:50, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object—It's not ready yet. -- Tony 00:34, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object -- article does not have completed sections, lead to short, and long lists instead of prose. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:45, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
Object. Too many redlinks, and no references. -[[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] ^{[[additions | e-mail]]} 21:45, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]