Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bulbasaur/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 16:56, 21 April 2009 [1].

Bulbasaur

Nominator(s): Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ ^Life_Death 14:51, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Bulbasaur for FA becasue it was a FA article previously, then WP:FANSITE came and knocked it out. Since then have worked hard and we believe it is ready again.Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ ^Life_Death 14:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – There are some unsourced statements and the reception section still needs to be expanded. Also, you're not a significant contributor to the article so this nomination should be removed. —TheLeft orium 15:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am.Not recently ,because I have been working on other pokemon, but I still worked on it a lot.-Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ ^Life_Death 15:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you used another account or something? Because the history page says you've only made two edits. TheLeft orium 15:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I helped from the project pages talk page, which since have been deleted, there left.-Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ ^Life_Death 15:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The article isn't ready yet. Cultural Impact still needs some expansion, one or two of the refs are dead links, etc. MelicansMatkin (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and suggest withdrawal; quite a long way from featuredness at the moment. Sceptre ^(talk) 16:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Please see WP:FAC/ar and leave the talk page templates in place until the bot processes. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.