Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Clonaid/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 01:32, 14 October 2007.
I hereby nominate this article for Featured Article status in hopes of making it appear on the 5th anniversary of the Clonaid claim on December 27, 2007.Kmarinas86 06:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Prior to the previous nom being withdrawn, there were two opposes for prose concerns, with some very good advice to seek a copyedit. There appears to have been no attempt to resolve these concerns, and so a brief read reveals plenty of prose problems. Please consider taking a more measured approach to bringing this to FAC. J.Winklethorpe talk 07:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- After receiving many comments like these, I am sure that the cause of my bad prose is systematic (even pathological) in nature. It has almost become a way of thinking for me. It's difficult to stop it.Kmarinas86 20:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixes needed. Gave the first paragraph a small copyedit. However, I've spotted a few issues:
- "Florida attorney Bernard Siegel tried to appoint a different guardian for Eve and threatened to sue Clonaid." This rasies several questions? Who was Eve's original guardian? Why would Siegel want to sue Clonaid? The sentence needs more context.
- Fixed. different→special.Kmarinas86 03:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. Reason given and cited.Kmarinas86 03:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- "A terminology dispute over whether Clonaid is really a company or just a project name led to accusations that that the whole Clonaid project was a sham." Sounds awkward (the change in tense in the middle of the sentence doesn't help). Accusations by whom? Who disputed the terminology?
- Fixed. I hope.Kmarinas86 03:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll add more comments soon. CloudNine 22:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Karanacs 19:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please include an appropriate infoboxPlease wikilink month and date combinationsThere are very few wikilinks in the article. You could add wikilinks to states, to newspapers and news broadcasts, etc.- I'm encouraged by the fact that these are minor problems. I will try to sort those out ASAP.Kmarinas86 00:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done.Kmarinas86 04:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Karanacs 19:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.