Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Doing Time for Patsy Cline/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 01:39, 21 January 2008.

Doing Time for Patsy Cline[edit]

Nominator 123321fun (talk) 07:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Check external links

I'm nominating this article for featured article because... 123321fun (talk) 07:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Hi 123321, and welcome to Wikipedia. Have you taken a look at the criteria for a featured article? Unfortunately, Doing Time for Patsy Cline isn't comprehensive enough yet, and it's not yet at the required professional standard of writing. The lead is too short, there isn't a production section, and the other sections are kind of thin. Of course, this doesn't mean that the article can't be a featured article in the future. If you want help in expanding the article, you may want to take a look at our peer review process or Wikipedia:WikiProject Films. BuddingJournalist 15:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Just echoing what Budding Journalist said. Listing an article like this for FA status is a common newbie mistake, though I'm sure if you dedicate yourself (or a group of editors) to the article long enough, you'll bring it up.-Wafulz (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The images you added in appear to be good, there's that. But yeah, just keep at editing the article, and when it's improved try WP:GAN first. For examples of Featured film articles, try looking over 300 (film), Jaws (film), and The Pit and the Pendulum (1961 film), among others, to see what needs to be added in and expanded upon to make this article FA. Wizardman 20:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose See above, WP:SNOWBALL — BQZip01 — ^talk 23:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball oppose per above. LuciferMorgan (talk) 00:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for obvious reasons. Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 01:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a joke? Plus this user only created his account 2 days ago.Sumoeagle179 (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the user is well-intentioned but very new. It's not an unthinkable mistake.-Wafulz (talk) 15:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.