Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/IBM/archive1

IBM[edit]

I thoroughly enjoyed this article, its neat chronological structure, comprehensive referencing and conciseness make it an ideal candidate for FAC in my view.BjF 22:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the instructions above: "Please do not post more than one nomination at a time, as this may make it difficult to do justice to each." Sandy 23:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, citation tags need fixed, refs come after punctuation, not before.Rlevse 01:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object at the very least the article has a copyedit tag on it with part of a summary "lots of typos" - and there has been little done sense it appears... RN 19:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Simply not there yet. Moncrief 16:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]