Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Missingno

Missingno.[edit]

I think this article is well developed and should be recognized as a featured article. it contains everything down from the origins of the infamous glitch, to the very sequnces of code that cause it.
--User:malomeat 13:55, 08 Feb 2006 (UTC)

Object. No inline references, infact, no references at all. Deskana (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object: No references. I wonder about this nomination, since six of the seven edits by this user concern Missingno being a good or featured article. --Pagrashtak 01:22, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object to add, I think Missingno.#Details should be turned from a list into prose. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire) Fair use policy} 07:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object - No references, Missingno.#Details needs prosification, in need of major restructure, to a certain extent, a general wikify. --Cel es tianpower ^háblame 10:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object per above. Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:21, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object The article lacks clearly identified references and proper attribution of material to them. Just including the sources among the external links is not enough. Please see WP:CITE. The issue of the lack of references also was raised at the peer review and never addressed, and also has been cited as the reason for removal from the "list of good articles". See the article talk page for the history of the above. --BACbKA 10:55, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object obviously. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 07:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]