Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Nottingham Panthers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted 16:14, 28 January 2008.
This article has now gone through two peer reviews and a successful GA nomination. I have been working on it for well over a year now and I think it now meets FA criteria. I will endeavor to address any concerns you might have. All comments and feedback would be greatly appreciated. KimThePanther (talk) 19:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great article and a pleasure to read.-- Palmiped (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Excellent article that opened my eyes to British hockey. Nice to see such good quality on a non-NHL based ice hockey article. Kaiser matias (talk) 02:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I changed one sentence, can't see anything else Jimfbleak (talk) 08:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please review the unresolved external links.SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- done I've removed the dead external link from the External Links section. I can't find the website it was supposed to be linking too. KimThePanther (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Struck, done. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please note that graphics, including coloured ticks and crosses, are discouraged in the instructions for this process.Tony (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Awesome article. I enjoyed reading it. Great photos too! - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Very well written.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves talk / contribs (join WP:PT) 06:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixes needed: References section is completely unformatted (it's not clear to me why that section is even there),
most of the footnotes are missing complete publication dates on news sources, and there are hyphens that should be endashes in the infobox. Named refs aren't used correclty (see WP:FN), example:
- ^ The A to Z Encyclopedia of Ice Hockey. Ahearne Cup. azhockey.com. Retrieved on January 5, 2008.
- ^ The A to Z Encyclopedia of Ice Hockey. Ahearne Cup. azhockey.com. Retrieved on January 5, 2008. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Responce Sorry Sandy - I've had a bit of computer trouble of the last day or so. Will get working through them now. KimThePanther (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I've replaced the hyphens in the infobox with endashes and redone the web and news citations (adding the publication dates for the latter). I can see your point about the References section, all the information is repeated in the Footnotes section, so should I just remove it? KimThePanther (talk) 22:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks like a complete duplicate; unless there's something there that's not already given in Footnotes, there's no need for that section. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've removed the references section. KimThePanther (talk) 15:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Responce Sorry Sandy - I've had a bit of computer trouble of the last day or so. Will get working through them now. KimThePanther (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.