Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Panavision
I started the article and have been working hard to build it up to featured status. Just came out of peer review, where it got a modest looking over. I want more critiques, though, and want it to be featured, so I figure this is the place! :) Thanks, guys. --Girolamo Savonarola 11:17, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
- Comment: One small detail. I think it would look better if the links in the "See also" section were capitalised like headings in accordance with the WP:MOS. It isn't a biggie, but it just looks a bit more professional. Harro5 11:36, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Done. --Girolamo Savonarola 12:14, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
- Support. I read this on Peer Review and was most impressed even then. --Theo (Talk) 19:29, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support, though I believe the standard is to capitalize only the first letter of section headings (except proper nouns of course), so it should be Early history and not Early History. Tuf-Kat 18:11, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks! Done. --Girolamo Savonarola 13:41, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)
- Support. Is it possible to get a screenshot of a "Filmed in Panivision" credit from one of the movies mentioned? --FuriousFreddy 19:35, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- No idea. I can't do it at the moment, unfortunately. (Computer's in surgery!) Anyone else up for the task? --Girolamo Savonarola 19:37, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)
- Support: It would be better if footnotes were used instead of just a list of references. Otherwise, a very comprehensive article.
Cyberjunkie TALK 14:41, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) - Support -- ALoan (Talk) 13:30, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
