Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 17:22, 4 April 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Es.ntp (talk) 03:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because this is a well-qualified article about geography. Es.ntp (talk) 03:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Comments:
- Why are there 2 infoboxes?
- Figures need references, :
- Dark Grotto (Hang Tối) This cave is 5,258 m long and with a height of 83 m etc.
- Reliability of following sources is questioned: Seem to be a tour agency sites
- So of the sites are in Vietnamese, WP:NONENG says "Because this is the English Wikipedia, editors should use English-language sources in preference to sources in other languages, assuming the availability of an English-language source of equal quality" . An UNESCO World Heritage Site will surely have plenty of "English-language source(s) of equal quality".--Redtigerxyz Talk 09:23, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Have the significant contriburors been consulted on this?
- Large unreferenced sections
- Large numbers of references lacking publishers or last access dates.
- Beyond the two sites listed above, what makes the following reliable? (Note this doesn't address any that aren't in English and that this is just a sample)
- Sources in non-English languages need to note this in the reference
- Surely there are book sources available for a UNESCO World Heritage site!
- LOTS of deadlinks
- Suggest withdrawl, there is serious work needed before this is ready. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:23, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.