Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Fancy cancel

Fancy cancel[edit]

Article is no longer a featured article.

this is barely bigger than a stub. How can it be a featured article? This article lacks breadth and detail. Kingturtle 09:40, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Kingturtle. Furthermore, it ought to be moved to pictorial postmark where it belongs. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 16:24, May 22, 2004 (UTC)

Support removal, for exactly the reasons given. Don't agree with the proposed name change though; it's apparent from the article that "fancy cancel" is a term of the art. Securiger 01:48, 24 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose removal. It's a concise, informative article on a little-known topic. It even has references. Nathan 21:51, Jun 10, 2004 (UTC)
Support removal. Too short; if people have written books on the topic, we can probably write a more detailed article. — Matt 00:10, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)