Wikipedia:Featured article review/Asthma/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by User:Raul654 22:49, 14 December 2008 [1].
Review commentary
[edit]- Notifications to Ziphon, Davidruben, Knowledge Seeker and WP MED
According to Wikipedia:Featured articles/Cleanup listing, Asthma is among our most problematic FAs. Promoted in 2005, it is largely uncited, has been tagged as needing citations for more than a year, has an undeveloped History section, has numerous short, stubby sections, and has an underdeveloped WP:LEAD. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep this article has some big problems. Hopefully we can get enough people interested to get this article back into shape. It was peer reviewed in July. Wikipedia:Peer_review/Asthma/archive2#BirgitteSB. Most of the recommendations are still applicable. Ziphon (ALLears) 04:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not currently meeting my definitions for FA. For instance, long inline quotes from researchers are completely out of place (section about long-acting beta-2 agonists). The history section is woefully inadequate (nothing to say apart from some random quote from a minor paper) and ignores about 2000 years of asthma research. JFW | T@lk 11:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey Sandy, whatever happened to "only one nomination at a time"? ;) Dabomb87 (talk) 00:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c), comprehensiveness (1b), and LEAD (2a). Marskell (talk) 17:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove 1c. DrKiernan (talk) 13:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove Would agree with the above comments. The lack of referencing is definitely a concern. Which such a well studied topic they are out the.--Doc James (talk) 22:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove Referencing issues. Cirt (talk) 03:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove 1c YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove 1c, major referencing issues. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.