Wikipedia:Featured article review/CSI effect/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:32, 19 November 2022 (UTC) [1].
Review section
[edit]I am nominating this featured article for review because of concerns raised by Hog Farm on the talk page 4 months ago, especially lack of inclusion of more recent and scholarly sources, while lower quality sources were used instead. (t · c) buidhe 02:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no edits to address the main concerns. There was some ref tidying/cleanup but otherwise minimal editing. (t · c) buidhe 17:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @Penlite: I see that are made lots of edits to the article on Oct. 16. Are you interested in fixing up this article? Z1720 (talk) 02:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Flattered to be asked, but swamped with several outside, major responsibilities right now. Not really up to it at present. Respectfully, ~ Penlite (talk) 10:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC sources indicated on the article's talk page have not been included yet, indicate that this article is not comprehensive with describing the academic research. Z1720 (talk) 12:32, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC issues still outstanding. (t · c) buidhe 06:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include comprehensiveness and sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - updating needed in several areas. For example, "New technologies and the increased public awareness of forensic science have stimulated new interest" sourced to 2008, or "However, more recent research suggests that these modern TV shows do have a misleading influence" to 2011 and 2015. There's new research on this subject since the article was promoted to FA, but it isn't reflected. Hog Farm Talk 14:12, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues unaddressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above. (t · c) buidhe 16:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:32, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.