Wikipedia:Featured article review/History of saffron/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Saravask, WikiProject Food and drink, WikiProject Food and drink/Herbs and Spices task force, WikiProject Agriculture, 2019-12-17, 2021-09-11
Review section
[edit]I am nominating this featured article for review because the article relies on one source for citations, while there are numerous unused sources listed in the References section. Numerous paragraphs are uncited. Article focuses too much attention on ancient history and contains very little information about post-19th century events. Z1720 (talk) 15:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, nothing happening. Hog Farm Talk 13:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and balance. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist I do not know why the nomination statement says this article "relies on one source for citations", as that is not the case. Nonetheless, it does have the problems laid out on talk, and they have not been addressed. Recent scholarship has not been consulted either. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 09:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - doesn't seem to include recent scholarship, agree with the talk page comments that recent history could be beefed up, and ideally Willard would be used less. Hog Farm Talk 16:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.