Wikipedia:Featured article review/Keith Miller with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by DrKay via FACBot (talk) 6:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [1].
Keith Miller with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948[edit]
- Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject, [diff for talk page notification]
I am nominating this featured article for review because... Pharaoh496 (talk) 10:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC) It was full of cruft, fake infobox, etc. Have merged it into parent article.[reply]
- No opinion • Merge discussion. • Article just before merge. --RobertG ♬ talk 11:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Pharaoh496 does not appear to have followed WP:MERGE in any meaningful way, so the merge should be reverted and a proper discussion should take place. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a merge discussion ongoing that seems to be headed for a merge result; will leave this open for the moment in anticipation of a likely procedural delist. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've closed the discussion as consensus to merge. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The discussion has ended with consensus to merge Pharaoh496 (talk) 12:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a merge discussion ongoing that seems to be headed for a merge result; will leave this open for the moment in anticipation of a likely procedural delist. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment in my limited understanding of the FAR process, I believe this needs a featured article review coordinators to close this discussion. I have requested one at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. If this is the wrong process, then please do the correct process instead :) . Joseph2302 (talk) 12:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since nobody apparently cares to merge, I've just redirected the article to the proposed merge target. If anything is deemed necessary to add to the merge target (which is already over 13,000 words long), it can be taken from the article history. Hog Farm Talk 13:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nevermind, I've been reverted by Jpeeling (FWIW, there's been a consensus to merge since the April discussion, not just the 10-day old AFD). Hog Farm Talk 15:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The AFD which only just closed had 7 !votes for merge and none for redirect. WP:PROMERGE states: "Don't just redirect the source page without copying any content if any good content from the source page exists." The fact the article was a FA suggests there's good content here. I fail to see why there has been such a rush to redirect. My edit to restore has been reverted and I will not be getting into an edit war about it. JP (Talk) 08:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural delist since there is no longer an article to speak of. Anyone is welcome to merge an appropriate amount of content, but this does not require the article to remain in the interim (thereby keeping this FAR open indefinitely). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural delist.See discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Bradman with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948,this article have been merged.--Real4jyy (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. DrKay (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.