Wikipedia:Featured article review/My Belarusy/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:23, 5 March 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Z1720, Zscout370, SUM1, WikiProject Belarus, WikiProject Songs, talk page notification 2018-08-18
- Glide08 please use {{subst:FARMessage|My Belarusy|alt=My Belarusy/archive2}} ~~~~ to notify the list of parties and pages above. Thanks! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]
- I have completed the notices. Z1720 (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Glide08 please use {{subst:FARMessage|My Belarusy|alt=My Belarusy/archive2}} ~~~~ to notify the list of parties and pages above. Thanks! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]
Review section
[edit]I am nominating this featured article for review because it appears to be lacking information behind the history of the anthem and the process of its creation and doesn't delve much into analyzing the anthem's lyrical content and music (for example, no mention is made for the allusion to the motto Long Live Belarus! in the chorus, despite the fact that its inclusion is anathema to the Lukashenko's government policy of Soviet nostalgia in state symbols). Glide08 (talk) 20:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: On the talk page in December 2021, I identified issues of comprehensiveness, particularly the creative process and development of this song and no analysis of the lyrics and music. Glide08, as a subject matter expert, has identified the specifics of what is missing, which I think is beneficial if an editor wants to bring this back to FA standards. Z1720 (talk) 16:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no edits since 17 Jan (t · c) buidhe 23:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section largely concern comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no progress. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - comprehensiveness issues; minimal/no engagement to correct concerns. Hog Farm Talk 14:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above, issues still present (t · c) buidhe 05:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:23, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.