Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/1989–90 snooker world rankings/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]

1989–90 snooker world rankings

Featured list candidates/1989–90 snooker world rankings/archive1

Nominator(s): BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For regular readers of these lists, there will be little surprise that Steve Davis is at the summit. Two former World Champions, Alex Higgins and Cliff Thorburn, were banned for a couple of ranking tournaments each. As ever, many thanks in advance for improvement suggestions, and I'm happy to provide relevant extracts from sources to reviewers. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"The list for the 1986–87 snooker season was the first to only take account of results over two seasons" - maybe mention that it also started to take into account other tournaments, otherwise some of the subsequent sentences don't really make sense
"A proposal by Barry Hearn [....] made a proposal" - some of these words can be removed
"after Higgind had been found guily in our of headbutting" - two words spelt wrong here and also "guilty in our".....?
""N" denotes that as a non-tournament, the player was not eligible to enter" => ""N" denotes that as a non-tournament player, the player was not eligible to enter"
Graham Cripsey's row has a totally blank cell
That's it I think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:24, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, ChrisTheDude. I've amended the article. Please let me know if anything else is required. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Alavense

I saw nothing wrong with either the prose or the tables. Being a bit persnickety, I'd suggest editing the {{sequence}} template at the end, so that it adjusts to the way seasons are now formatted in titles. Support. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, that's a sensible change. Thank you, Alavense. Done for this article. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Have conducted a full review and cannot find anything to fault EnthusiastWorld37 (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

Reliable enough for the information being cited
Consistent date formatting
Consistent and proper reference formatting
Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for

Hey man im josh (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.